On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 08:46:47PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:29:19PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > The attached is back-patches from 9.5 through master.
>
> Thanks. I've made some edits. I'll plan to push the attached patches on
> Friday or Saturday.
Pushed, after adding a missing "break" to gist_identify() and tweaking two
more comments. However, a diverse minority of buildfarm members are failing
like this, in most branches:
Mar 21 13:16:37 # Failed test 'wal_level = minimal, SET TABLESPACE, hint bit'
Mar 21 13:16:37 # at t/018_wal_optimize.pl line 231.
Mar 21 13:16:37 # got: '1'
Mar 21 13:16:37 # expected: '2'
Mar 21 13:16:46 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 34.
Mar 21 13:16:46 [13:16:46] t/018_wal_optimize.pl ................
-- https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2020-03-21%2016%3A52%3A05
Since I run two of the failing animals, I expect to reproduce this soon.
fairywren failed differently on 9.5; I have not yet studied it:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2020-03-21%2018%3A01%3A10
> > It lacks a part of TAP infrastructure nowadays we have, but I
> > want to have the test (and it actually found a bug I made during this
> > work). So I added a patch to back-patch TestLib.pm, PostgresNode.pm
> > and RecursiveCopy.pm along with 018_wal_optimize.pl.
> > (0004-Add-TAP-test-for-WAL-skipping-feature.patch)
>
> That is a good idea. Rather than make it specific to this test, I would like
> to back-patch all applicable test files from 9.6 src/test/recovery. I'll plan
> to push that one part on Thursday.
That push did not cause failures.
