Re: color by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: color by default
Date
Msg-id 20200321032207.GE10066@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: color by default  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: color by default  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:15:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> I can confirm there is still no mention of PG_COLORS in our
> >> documentation.
> 
> > My mistake, PG_COLOR (not PG_COLORS) is documented properly.
> 
> Yeah, but the point is precisely that pg_logging_init()
> also responds to PG_COLORS, which is not documented anywhere.

Oh, I thought it was a typo.  OK, so it still an open item.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: color by default
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Add A Glossary