Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
Date
Msg-id 20200319183928.rennw23ej4ohgubc@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020-03-19 17:21:38 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Pushed! Thanks!

FWIW, I'm a bit doubtful that incuring the overhead of this by default
on everybody is a nice thing. On filesystems with high latency and with
a lot of small relations the overhead of stating a lot of files can be
almost as high as the actual base backup.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Some improvements to numeric sqrt() and ln()