Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target
Date
Msg-id 20200318155326.h2umvzrdu4qnzgji@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Multivariate MCV list vs. statistics target  ("Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)"<noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:32:19PM +0000, Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan
A&PS Delivery) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>Thanks for the report. Yes, this is clearly an omission. I think it
>>would be better to use wording >similar to attstattarget, per the
>>attached patch. That is, without reference to ALTER STATISTICS and
>>>better explaination of what positive/negative values do. Do you
>>>agree?
>
>Thank you for your comment.  I agree with the text you suggested.
>

Thank you for the report, I've pushed the reworded fix.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: potential stuck lock in SaveSlotToPath()
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: add support for IN and @> in functional-dependencystatistics use