Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Date
Msg-id 20200318002636.gkursyzaoktcylk3@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi,

On 2020-03-17 01:14:02 +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> lazy_check_needs_freeze() is only called for an aggressive vacuum, which
> this isn't.

Hm? I mean some of these will be aggressive vacuums, because it's older
than vacuum_freeze_table_age? And the lower age limit would make that
potentially more painful, no?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Next
From: Nikita Glukhov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters