Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Date
Msg-id 20200317162044.GX26184@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:33:32PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Yeah, in cluster(), mark_index_clustered().
> 
> Patch 0002 from Justin does that, I would keep this refactoring as
> HEAD-only material though, and I don't spot any other code paths in
> need of patching.
> 
> The commit message of patch 0001 is not what you wanted I guess.

That's what git-am does, and I didn't find any option to make it less
unreadable.  I guess I should just delete the email body it inserts.

|       The commit message is formed by the title taken from the "Subject: ", a
|       blank line and the body of the message up to where the patch begins. Excess
|       whitespace at the end of each line is automatically stripped.

-- 
Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: add support for IN and @> in functional-dependencystatistics use
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation versioning