Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Subject Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
Date
Msg-id 20200305104102.06516ec7@firost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:32:45 +0100
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:15 AM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-03-05 05:53, Fujii Masao wrote:  
> > > Or, as another approach, it might be worth considering to make
> > > the server always estimate the total backup size whether --progress is
> > > specified or not, as Amit argued upthread. If the time required to
> > > estimate the backup size is negligible compared to total backup time,
> > > IMO this approach seems better. If we adopt this, we can also get
> > > rid of PROGESS option from BASE_BACKUP replication command.  
> >
> > I think that would be preferable.  
> 
> +1

+1



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Change atoi to strtol in same place
Next
From: tushar
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests