Re: Cast to uint16 in pg_checksum_page() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Cast to uint16 in pg_checksum_page()
Date
Msg-id 20200304125208.GK2593@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cast to uint16 in pg_checksum_page()  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: Cast to uint16 in pg_checksum_page()  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 07:02:43AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> Yes, this is being included in an external project. Previously we have used
> a highly marked-up version but we are now trying to pull in the header more
> or less verbatim.
>
> Since this header is specifically designated as something external projects
> may want to use I think it makes sense to fix the warning.

This sounds like a sensible argument, similar to the ones raised on
the other thread, so no objections from me to improve things here.  I
can look at that tomorrow, except if somebody else beats me to it.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hamid Akhtar
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor issues in .pgpass
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench