Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index
Date
Msg-id 20200302032818.GB32059@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:52:58AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Rebased Amit's patch and included my own 0002 to fix the REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
> issue.

I have looked at 0002 as that concerns me.

> +SELECT indexrelid::regclass FROM pg_index WHERE indrelid='concur_clustered'::regclass;
> +       indexrelid
> +------------------------
> + concur_clustered_i_idx
> +(1 row)

This test should check after indisclustered.  Except that, the patch
is fine so I'll apply it if there are no objections.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Ought to use heap_multi_insert() for pg_attribute/dependinsertions?
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication empty transactions