On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:30:25PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> * I think the function name is too generic. init_vacuum_error_callback
> or init_vacuum_errcallback is better.
> * The comment of this function is not accurate since this function is
> not only for heap vacuum but also index vacuum. How about just
> "Initialize vacuum error callback"?
> * I think it's easier to read the code if we set the relname and
> indname in the same order.
> * The comment I wrote in the previous mail seems better, because in
> this function the reader might get confused that 'rel' is a relation
> or an index depending on the phase but that comment helps it.
Fixed these
> * rel->rd_index->indexrelid should be rel->rd_index->indrelid.
Ack. I think that's been wrong since I first wrote it two weeks ago :(
The error is probably more obvious due to the switch statement you proposed.
Thanks for continued reviews.
--
Justin
