Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
Date
Msg-id 20200207213519.mjgcvnpz6gn7pkyd@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans  (Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov@imap.cc>)
Responses Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:22:12PM +0000, Alexey Bashtanov wrote:
>Hello,
>
>>It took me a while to figure out what those names mean.  "unfetched",
>>as you call it on the code, may be more descriptive than "avoided" for
>>the new label.  However I think the other two are more confusing.  It
>>may be a good idea to change them together with this.
>It'll be sad if this patch is forgotten only because of the words choice.
>I've changed it all to "unfetched" for at least not to call the same 
>thing differently
>in the code and in the output, and also rebased it and fit in 80 lines 
>width limit.
>

I kinda suspect one of the ressons why this got so little attention is
that it was never added to any CF.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing WaitEventSet syscall churn
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Draft release notes are up for review