On 2020-Feb-05, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The second item genereated another thread a little after this thread.
> Everything was handled on this other thread. Ultimately, I rejected
> the enhancement on the grounds that it wasn't safe on standbys in the
> face of concurrent splits and deletions [1].
>
> I believe that all of the items discussed on this thread have been
> resolved. Did I miss a CF entry or something?
Nah. I just had one of the messages flagged in my inbox, and I wasn't
sure what had happened since the other thread was not referenced in this
one. I wasn't looking at any CF entries.
Thanks for the explanation,
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
