Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers
Date
Msg-id 20200131.143553.1645234594103638026.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:45:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in 
> On 2020-Jan-30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> 
> > Agreed about backbranches. I'd like to preserve the word "transaction"
> > as it is more familiar to users. How about something like the follows?
> > 
> > "transactions are completed up to log time %s"
> 
> That's a good point.  I used the phrase "transaction activity", which
> seems sufficiently explicit to me.
> 
> So, the attached is the one for master; in back branches I would use the
> same (plus minor conflict fixes), except that I would drop the message
> wording changes.
> 
> Thanks for the reviews so far,

My pleasure.

regads.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: MSVC installs too much stuff?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add more compile-time asserts to exposeinconsistencies.