On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 04:33:46AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 04:13, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > > I agree with the sentiment of the third doc change, but your patch removes
> > > the mention of n_distinct, which isn't appropriate.
> >
> > I think it's correct to remove n_distinct there, as it's documented previously,
> > since e5550d5f. That's a per-attribute option (not storage) and can't be
> > specified there.
>
> OK, then agreed.
Attached minimal patch with just this hunk.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2417/
=> RFC
Justin
(I'm resending in a new thread since it looks like the first message was
somehow sent as a reply to an unrelated thread.)
