On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 06:45:16PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Usually when I apply "wording" doc patches to head only, someone
> complains that it should be backpatched, so I did that in this case. If
> we want to change that idea, we need to agree on the criteria.
>
> True, but it's not a wording patch, you're entirely renaming a feature.
>
> I agree with the change of default to predefined, but it shouldn't be
> backpatched.
>
> There should be a comment in there that it was previously known as "default
> roles", with indexed terms for both.
Well, I am renaming the documentation label for the feature. Is that
different than wording? I guess I can see that. If everyone agrees I
can revert the backpatch, but I don't want to do that if other people
are going to say this should be backpatched.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
