Re: SlabCheck leaks memory into TopMemoryContext - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: SlabCheck leaks memory into TopMemoryContext
Date
Msg-id 20200116170432.gkpxd5xxhyodekw7@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SlabCheck leaks memory into TopMemoryContext  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SlabCheck leaks memory into TopMemoryContext  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:43:34AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> The attached fix should do the trick - it pre-allocates the space when
>> creating the context. There is a bit of complexity because we want to
>> allocate the space as part of the context header, but nothin too bad. We
>> might optimize it a bit by using a regular bitmap (instead of just an
>> array of bools), but I haven't done that.
>
>Hmm ... so if this is an array of bools, why isn't it declared bool*
>rather than char* ?  (Pre-existing ugliness, sure, but we might as
>well fix it while we're here.  Especially since you used sizeof(bool)
>in the space calculation.)
>

True. Will fix.

>I agree that maxaligning the start point of the array is pointless.
>
>I'd write "free chunks in a block" not "free chunks on a block",
>the latter seems rather shaky English.  But that's getting picky.
>
>LGTM otherwise.
>

OK. Barring objections I'll push and backpatch this later today.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: SlabCheck leaks memory into TopMemoryContext
Next
From: Alexey Kondratov
Date:
Subject: Re: Physical replication slot advance is not persistent