Re: backup manifests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: backup manifests
Date
Msg-id 20200114183312.GF32763@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup manifests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: backup manifests  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:53:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > ... I would also expect that depending on an external package
> > would provoke significant opposition. If we suck the code into core,
> > then we have to keep it up to date with the upstream, which is a
> > significant maintenance burden - look at all the time Tom has spent on
> > snowball, regex, and time zone code over the years.
> 
> Also worth noting is that we have a seriously bad track record about
> choosing external packages to depend on.  The regex code has no upstream
> maintainer anymore (well, the Tcl guys seem to think that *we* are
> upstream for that now), and snowball is next door to moribund.
> With C not being a particularly hip language to develop in anymore,
> it wouldn't surprise me in the least for any C-code JSON parser
> we might pick to go dead pretty soon.

Given jq's extreme popularity and compatible license, I'd nominate that.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode escapes with any backend encoding
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible