Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 20200113201216.GA17684@nol
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:32:53PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:08:40AM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> >
> >"if any code tried to access the statistics directly from the table, 
> >rather than via the caches".
> >
> >Currently optimizer is accessing statistic though caches. So this 
> >approach works. If somebody will rewrite optimizer or provide own 
> >custom optimizer in extension which access statistic directly
> >then it we really be a problem. But I wonder why bypassing catalog 
> >cache may be needed.
> >
> 
> I don't know, but it seems extensions like hypopg do it.

AFAIR, hypopg only opens pg_statistic to use its tupledesc when creating
statistics on hypothetical partitions, but it should otherwise never reads or
need plain pg_statistic rows.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: our checks for read-only queries are not great
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmarking Flex practices