On 2020-Jan-09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Hmm, so why not revert the test only in the back branches, given that
> > it's not so onerous in master?
>
> I grow tired of repeating myself, but: it's purely accidental that this
> test passes in master for the existing set of buildfarm members.
Oh, I forgot we had that problem. I agree with reverting the test,
rather than building all the extra functionality needed to make it more
stable, in that case.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
