On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:56:01AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And done this way as per the attached. I am of course open to
> objections or better ideas, though this looks formulation looks pretty
> good to me. Robert?
Just to be clear here, I would like to commit this patch and backpatch
with the current formulation in the error strings in the follow-up
days. In 9.4~10, the error cannot be reached, but that feels safer if
we begin to work again on this portion of the autovacuum code. So if
you would like to object, that's the moment..
--
Michael