Greetings,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm not objecting to adding it, I'm just curious. In fact, I think
> that if we do add this, then we should probably add lcm() at the same
> time, since handling its overflow cases is sufficiently non-trivial to
> justify not requiring users to have to implement it themselves.
I tend to agree with this.
Thanks,
Stephen
