Re: Hooks for session start and end, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Dec-20, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of
> >> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people
> >> were not happy with it.
> 
> > Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then?  Having it be
> > marked committed seems pretty confusing.  The next version of the patch
> > would have its own CF entry, I presume.
> 
> RWF seems appropriate.  We haven't rejected the concept altogether,
> AFAICT.

Fair enough.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services