Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hamlin, Garick L
Subject Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows
Date
Msg-id 20191218142419.fvv4ikm4wq4gnkco@isc.upenn.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:52:15PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> To implement this, tweak things so that setting DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR
> to "" has the desired effect.  This mostly already worked like that;
> only a few places needed to be adjusted.  Notably, the reference to
> DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR in UNIXSOCK_PATH() could be removed because all
> callers already resolve an empty socket directory setting with a
> default if appropriate.

Would it make sense to support abstract sockets in PostgreSQL?

I know it's bit unrelated.  I haven't read all the code here I just was
thinking about it because of the code checking the leading \0 byte of the dir.

Garick


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: jacana seems to be failing in recoverycheck from last few runs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql's EDITOR behavior on Windows