On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:11:40AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> One way would be to provide a variant expected-file, but that's not going
> to be fun for future maintenance of the test script. Another simple
> answer is to crank up client_min_messages for this one test to hide the
> WARNING, but you could conjure scenarios where that misses something
> important. (Of course, not running the test at all would also miss
> any such issue.)
Alternate output files should be IMO avoided if we can, so if I were
to choose sneaking a SET client_min_messages would be fine, but only
for the second create tablespace..
--
Michael
