Re: pglz performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: pglz performance
Date
Msg-id 20191128224356.4oca4lijnpnqctqa@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pglz performance  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: pglz performance
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:27:49PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
>
>> 27 нояб. 2019 г., в 20:28, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> написал(а):
>>
>>>>
>>>> 6) I'm pretty sure the comment in the 'while (off < len)' branch will be
>>>> badly mangled by pgindent.
>>>
>>> I think I can just write it without line limit and then run pgindent.
>>> Will try to do it this evening. Also, I will try to write more about
>>> memmove.
>Well, yes, I could not make pgindent format some parts of that comment, gave up and left only simple text.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 7) The last change moving "copy" to the next line seems unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Oh, looks like I had been rewording this comment, and eventually came
>>> to the same text..Yes, this change is absolutely unnecessary.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Good. I'll wait for an updated version of the patch and then try to get
>> it pushed by the end of the CF.
>

OK, pushed, with some minor cosmetic tweaks on the comments (essentially
using the formatting trick pointed out by Alvaro), and removing one
unnecessary change in pglz_maximum_compressed_size.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer: PANIC: could not fsync file: No such file or directory