Re: amcheck verification for GiST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: amcheck verification for GiST
Date
Msg-id 20191128035710.GP237562@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: amcheck verification for GiST  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:10:20PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Why is this not a problem for the new amcheck checks?  Maybe this is a
> very naive question. I don't claim to be a GiST expert.

This thread did not receive any updates after a couple of months, and
visibly input was waited from Andrey, so I am marking it as returned
with feedback in the CF.  Please feel free to update the CF entry or
register a new entry once you have dealt with the comments from Peter
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add a GUC variable that control logical replication
Next
From: nuko yokohama
Date:
Subject: To Suggest a "DROP INCREMENTAL MATERIALIZED VIEW" in psql, but thesyntax error when you run.