Re: BUG #16136: Bug with cost calculation and JIT application - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: BUG #16136: Bug with cost calculation and JIT application
Date
Msg-id 20191125132715.qrbeytjrmhinba7m@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #16136: Bug with cost calculation and JIT application  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 01:00:34PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
>Bug reference:      16136
>Logged by:          Александр Филиппенко
>Email address:      alexfilus@gmail.com
>PostgreSQL version: 12.1
>Operating system:   Ubuntu 18.04
>Description:
>
>I had very strange behaviour of optimizator.
>https://explain.depesz.com/s/GcHL
>https://explain.depesz.com/s/sTyG
>Both explains are for same query and same data set, but in second case I
>turn off JIT. I guess it's because of wrong cost calculation like this
>Nested Loop  (cost=463.86..5575122.76 rows=652 width=74) (actual
>time=9.685..67.713 rows=18 loops=1)
>

Not sure what exactly you mean by "wrong cost calculation"?


The reason for the long duration with JIT seems pretty clear:

   Functions: 237
   Options: Inlining true, Optimization true, Expressions true, Deforming true
   Timing: Generation 45.190 ms, Inlining 37.452 ms, Optimization 1292.680 ms, Emission 1076.752 ms, Total 2452.074 ms

That is, it took about 2.3s to optimize and emit the JIT code, most
likely because due to a fairly high number of functions. I'm not sure
that's something we can really fix, but there were discussions about
being smarter about optimizations etc.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services 



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16136: Bug with cost calculation and JIT application
Next
From: Marco Cuccato
Date:
Subject: Re: LDAPS trusted ca support