Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
Date
Msg-id 20191122225632.GA9169@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Nov-22, Antonin Houska wrote:

> As I pointed out in
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/88183.1574261429%40antos
> 
> seg.ws_off only replaced readOff in XLogReaderState. So we should only update
> ws_off where readOff was updated before commit 709d003. This does happen in
> ReadPageInternal (see HEAD) and I see no reason for the final patch to update
> ws_off anywhere else.

Oh you're right.

I see no reason to leave ws_off.  We can move that to XLogReaderState; I
did that here.  We also need the offset in WALReadError, though, so I
added it there too.  Conceptually it seems clearer to me this way.

What do you think of the attached?

BTW I'm not clear what errors can pread()/pg_pread() report that do not
set errno.  I think lines 1083/1084 of WALRead are spurious now.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] (firsttupleslot)==NULL is redundant or is possible nulldereference?
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: RE: [BUG] (firsttupleslot)==NULL is redundant or is possible nulldereference?