Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal
Date
Msg-id 20191113073449.GX1549@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Coding in WalSndWaitForWal  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:27:16AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> It seems to me it'd be better to just remove the "get a more recent
> flush pointer" block - it doesn't seem to currently surve a meaningful
> purpose.

+1.  That was actually my suggestion upthread :)
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use separate PartitionedRelOptions structure to storepartitioned table options
Next
From: Surafel Temesgen
Date:
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option