At Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:07:10 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in
> The argument for changing the code like this seems to be "we'll
> assume the possibility of a bug/corruption is so small that it's
> okay to treat it as a user mistake". I reject that line of thinking.
Ah, understood.
> And I especially reject conflating the two cases without bothering
> to fix the adjacent comment that describes only case 1.
Mm. I should be more careful..
Anyway thanks for fixing this!
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
