On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:06:46AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>On 10/20/19 11:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 06:51:05PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>>True. And AFAIK catching exceptions is not really possible in some code,
>>e.g. in stored procedures (because we can't do subtransactions, so no
>>exception blocks).
>>
>
>Can you explain the above to me as I thought there are exception
>blocks in stored functions and now sub-transactions in stored
>procedures.
>
Sorry for the confusion - I've not been particularly careful when
writing that response.
Let me illustrate the issue with this example:
CREATE TABLE t (a int);
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test() LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$
DECLARE
msg TEXT;
BEGIN
-- SAVEPOINT s1;
INSERT INTO t VALUES (1);
-- COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN others THEN
msg := SUBSTR(SQLERRM, 1, 100);
RAISE NOTICE 'error: %', msg;
END; $$;
CALL test();
If you uncomment the SAVEPOINT, you get
NOTICE: error: unsupported transaction command in PL/pgSQL
because savepoints are not allowed in stored procedures. Fine.
If you uncomment the COMMIT, you get
NOTICE: error: cannot commit while a subtransaction is active
which happens because the EXCEPTION block creates a subtransaction, and
we can't commit when it's active.
But we can commit outside the exception block:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test() LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$
DECLARE
msg TEXT;
BEGIN
BEGIN
INSERT INTO t VALUES (1);
EXCEPTION
WHEN others THEN
msg := SUBSTR(SQLERRM, 1, 100);
RAISE NOTICE 'error: %', msg;
END;
COMMIT;
END; $$;
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services