On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 07:47:13 +0200
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:32 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:00:15PM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > > Jehan-Guillaume (in Cc) reported me today a problem with logical
> > > replication, where in case of network issue the walsender is correctly
> > > terminating at the given wal_sender_timeout but the logical worker
> > > kept waiting indefinitely.
> > >
> > > The issue is apparently a simple thinko, the timestamp of the last
> > > received activity being unconditionally set at the beginning of the
> > > main processing loop, making any reasonable timeout setting
> > > ineffective. Trivial patch to fix the problem attached.
> >
> > Right, good catch. That's indeed incorrect. The current code would
> > just keep resetting the timeout if walrcv_receive() returns 0 roughly
> > once per NAPTIME_PER_CYCLE. The ping sent to the server once reaching
> > half of wal_receiver_timeout was also broken because of that.
> >
> > In short, applied and back-patched down to 10.
>
> Thanks Michael!
Thank you both guys!
