On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:33:22AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder if it isn't the right solution to set 'progress' to false
> in that spot, instead. index_drop says it must only be called by the
> dependency machinery; are we depending on that to pass-through the need
> to update progress status? I'm going over that code now.
pgstat_progress_end_command() is done for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY after
the concurrent drop, so it made sense to me to still report any PID
REINDEX CONC is waiting for at this stage.
--
Michael
