On 2019-Sep-26, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Alternative is DROP DATABASE [IF EXISTS] name [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ] [ WITH
> FORCE ]
>
> but in this case WIDTH keyword should not be optional (If I need to solve
> Tom's note). Currently WITH keyword is optional every where, so I think so
> using syntax with required WIDTH keyword is not happy.
Well, you would have one of those:
DROP DATABASE [IF EXISTS] name WITH (FORCE)
DROP DATABASE [IF EXISTS] name
Naturally, the WITH is optional in the sense that the clause itself is
optional. (Note we don't have CASCADE/RESTRICT in DROP DATABASE.)
You propose
DROP DATABASE (FORCE) [IF EXISTS] name
which seems weird to me -- I think only legacy syntax uses that form.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
