On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:24:30AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And both make sense.
>
> + * Return true if channel binding was employed and the scram exchange
> upper('scram')?
>
> Except for this nit, it looks good to me.
For the archive's sake: this has been committed as of d6e612f.
- * We pretend that the connection is OK for the duration of these
- * queries.
+ * We pretend that the connection is OK for the duration of
+ * these queries.
The result had some noise diffs. Perhaps some leftover from the
indentation run? That's no big deal anyway.
--
Michael