Hi,
On 2019-09-22 11:45:05 -0400, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:25 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > >Is there an innocent explanation for this? I thought logical
> > >replication
> > >slots provided an iron-clad guarantee that WAL would be retained until
> > >it
> > >was no longer needed. I am just using pub/sub, none of the lower level
> > >stuff.
> >
> > It indeed should. What's the content of
> > pg_replication_slot for that slot?
> >
>
> Unfortunately I don't think I have that preserved. If I can reproduce the
> issue, would preserving data/pg_replslot/sub/state help as well?
Can't hurt. Best together with other slots, if they exists.
Could you describe the system a bit?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
