On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:49:14AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
> refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
> "AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
> intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs.
> Any thoughts from others?
Actually, looking around we use connection_name for other commands
like EXEC SQL or DISCONNECT, so renaming connection_object to
connection_name makes the documentation more consistent. And done.
--
Michael
