On 2019-Sep-19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Sep-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Well, I think that was useless, so I rebased again -- attached.
>
> ... which is how you find out that 0001 as an independent patch is not
> really a valid one, since it depends on an API change that does not
> happen until 0005.
... and there were other compilation problems too, presumably fixed
silently by Joe in his rebase, but which I fixed again for this series
which now seems more credible. I tested compile and regression tests
after each patch, it all works locally.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
