Re: errbacktrace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: errbacktrace
Date
Msg-id 20190913155432.GA1200@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: errbacktrace  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: errbacktrace
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Aug-20, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> The memory management of that seems too complicated.  The "extra"
> mechanism of the check/assign hooks only supports one level of malloc.
> Using a List seems impossible.  I don't know if you can safely do a
> malloc-ed array of malloc-ed strings either.

Here's an idea -- have the check/assign hooks create a different
representation, which is a single guc_malloc'ed chunk that is made up of
every function name listed in the GUC, separated by \0.  That can be
scanned at error time comparing the function name with each piece.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Next
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files