On 2019-Jul-31, Rafia Sabih wrote:
> I had a look at this patch, seems like a useful thing to have.
So the two initial questions for this patch are
1. Is this a feature we want?
2. Is the user interface correct?
I think the feature is useful, and Rafia also stated as much. Therefore
ISTM we're okay on that front.
As for the UI, Fabien thinks the patch adopts one that's far too
simplistic, and I agree. Fabien has proposed a number of different UIs,
but doesn't seem convinced of any of them. One of them was to have
"options" in the command,
\dt+ [-o 1d,2a]
Another idea is to use variables in a more general form. So instead of
Pavel's proposal of SORT_BY_SIZE=on we could do something like
SORT_BY=[list]
where the list after the equal sign consists of predetermined elements
(say SIZE, NAME, SCHEMA and so on) and indicates a specific column to
sort by. This is less succint than Fabien's idea, and in particular you
can't specify it in the command itself but have to set the variable
beforehand instead.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
