Re: REINDEX filtering in the backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: REINDEX filtering in the backend
Date
Msg-id 20190906045654.GA1608@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX filtering in the backend  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 01:54:53PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Right.  We should aim to get per-object collation version tracking done.
>  And then we might want to have a REINDEX variant that processes exactly
> those indexes with an out-of-date version number -- and then updates
> that version number once the reindexing is done.  I think that project
> is achievable for PG13.
>
> I think we can keep this present patch in our back pocket for, say, the
> last commit fest if we don't make sufficient progress on those other
> things.  Right now, it's hard to review because the target is moving,
> and it's unclear what guidance to give users.

Okay, agreed.  I have marked the patch as returned with feedback
then.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Plug-in common/logging.h with vacuumlo and oid2name