Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date
Msg-id 20190903174014.GA18683@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Jul-19, Amit Khandekar wrote:

> Attached are the split patches. Included is an additional patch that
> has doc changes. Here is what I have added in the docs. Pasting it
> here so that all can easily spot how it is supposed to behave, and to
> confirm that we are all on the same page :

... Apparently, this patch was not added to the commitfest for some
reason; and another patch that *is* in the commitfest has been said to
depend on this one (Petr's https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/1961/
which hasn't been updated in quite a while and has received no feedback
at all, not even from the listed reviewer Shaun Thomas).  To make
matters worse, Amit's patchset no longer applies.

What I would like to do is add a link to this thread to CF's 1961 entry
and then update all these patches, in order to get things moving.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallelscan?
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGQUIT on archiver child processes maybe not such a hot idea?