Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Date
Msg-id 20190902231948.GA5343@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Sep-03, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> I think patches 0001-0008 are very clear and extends our index-AM
> infrastructure in query straightforward way.  I'm going to propose
> them for commit after some further polishing.

Hmm.  Why is 0001 needed?  I see that 0005 introduces a call to that
function, but if attnum == 0 then it doesn't call it.  Maybe it was
necessary in an older version of the patch?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade version checking questions