On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:52:55AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> That was already suggested by Thomas and seconded by Peter E., see
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2b1504ac-3d6c-11ec-e1ce-3daf132b3d37%402ndquadrant.com.
>
> I personally think that it's a sensible approach, and I'll be happy to
> propose a patch for that too if no one worked on this yet.
That may be interesting to sort out first then because we'd likely
want to know what is first in the catalogs before designing the
filtering processing looking at it, no?
--
Michael
