Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free orcorruption (!prev) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free orcorruption (!prev)
Date
Msg-id 20190826165812.GH7201@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free or corruption (!prev)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free or corruption (!prev)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:45:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> However ... there is some pretty interesting info at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338673
> suggesting that compiling with a late-model gcc against older RHEL6
> headers could result in bad code.  I wonder whether the reporters'
> servers were built using such a configuration.  (Although the linkage,
> if any, to this report still wouldn't be very clear.)

That's a question for Devrim ?

Can you tell which glibc headers were installed when compiling this package?
postgresql11-server-11.5-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64

I can tell it was compiled using
version | PostgreSQL 11.5 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23), 64-bit

Maybe it doesn't matter, since, for better or worse, is not a "late model" cc.

https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-4.4/
GCC 4.4.7
    March 13, 2012 (changes) 
This release series is no longer maintained.

Justin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free or corruption (!prev)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free or corruption (!prev)