On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 04:30:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > Is pg_rewind the only thing that this hits?
>
> pg_dump has forced statement_timeout to 0 for ages. If pg_rewind
> is also likely to have a long-running transaction, I don't see any
> good reason for it not to do likewise.
My mistake.
I meant to ask whether, in addition to pg_dump and pg_rewind, there
are other things that should ignore statement_timeout settings.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
