Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
Date
Msg-id 20190820043445.GA15766@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Aug-20, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:23:19AM -0700, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > Could you do the check that all steps have been used in dry_run mode
> > instead of when running the tests for real?
> 
> Sure, I was hesitating to do so.  I have no issue in moving the check
> into run_testspec().  So done as attached.

I created the dry-run mode to be able to easily generate the set of
possible permutations for a new test, then edit the result and put it
back in the spec file; but after the deadlock tests were added (with
necessary hacking of the lock-detection in isolationtester) that manner
of operation became almost completely useless.  Maybe we need to rethink
what facilities isolationtester offers -- possibly making dry-run have a
completely different behavior than currently, which I doubt anybody is
using.

All that being said, I have no objections to this patch (but I didn't
review it closely).

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps