Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date
Msg-id 20190814025253.GD14446@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor  (Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor  (Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:38:01AM +0900, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> On 2019/08/13 14:40, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
>> On 2019/08/02 3:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Hmm, I'm trying this out now and I don't see the index_rebuild_count
>>> ever go up.  I think it's because the indexes are built using parallel
>>> index build ... or maybe it was the table AM changes that moved things
>>> around, not sure.  There's a period at the end when the CLUSTER command
>>> keeps working, but it's gone from pg_stat_progress_cluster.
>>
>> Thanks for your report.
>> I'll investigate it. :)
>
> I did "git bisect" and found the commit:
>
>  03f9e5cba0ee1633af4abe734504df50af46fbd8
>  Report progress of REINDEX operations

I am adding an open item for this one.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem while updating a foreign table pointing to a partitionedtable on foreign server
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: using explicit_bzero