Re: no default hash partition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: no default hash partition
Date
Msg-id 20190807162502.GA28350@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: no default hash partition  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Aug-06, Stephen Frost wrote:

> Yeah, that's a fair argument, but giving the user a way to say that
> would address it.  As in, "create me a list-partitioned table for these
> values, plus a default."  Anyhow, I'm sure that I'm taking this beyond
> what we need to do right now, just sharing where I think it'd be good
> for things to go.

Fabien Coelho already submitted a patch for this IIRC.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength