On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:10:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:18:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> b654714 has reworked the way we handle removal of CLRF for several
>> code paths, and has repeated the same code patterns to do that in 8
>> different places. Could it make sense to refactor things as per the
>> attached with a new routine in common/string.c?
>
> Yes, I think this is a good idea.
Thanks for the review, Bruce! Tom, do you have any objections?
--
Michael